Conversing with Captain Obvious

The other day, I watched Lord of the Rings Return of the King with my roommate. And, in addition to being STILL blown away by the sheer epic of that movie despite multiple rewatchings and ten years of advances in special effects, I couldn’t help falling into fits of giggles every time Legolas opens his mouth.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I genuinely love the character of Legolas. He’s the ultimate badass of pretty boys and his friendship with Gimli and the dynamic between them makes him easily one of my favourite characters. But despite all this…

Legolas really has a knack for stating the obvious, doesn’t he?

There’s an even better example of this (which I sadly couldn’t find a clip for) where they’re swanning (the default way of walking for all self-respecting elves) around a war camp and the horses are neighing and shifting around nervously. Thankfully we have Legolas to let us know after about ten seconds of this that “the horses are restless”.

Insightful. If that’s the epitome of elf wisdom I wonder how Middle Earth survived.

But Legolas’s stunning acuity did get me to thinking. Most conversations are pretty much the exact opposite of that. Instead of having people helpfully letting you know exactly what’s happening and why, often conversations are as much about what’s not said.

For example, say that your characters are simply talking and one of them unwittingly insults the other. What happens?

If the insulted character were Legolas the rest of the conversation would probably go along the lines of “You have insulted me and now I am angry.”

Bonus points if it was in elvish and he rounds it off by prancing away into the trees

But when does that happen in real life? When was the last time outside of a Self help workshop that you heard someone honestly state their feelings?

When you’re talking with someone which is more likely? That they’ll tell you flat out that they are feeling miserable today? Or that you’ll pick up on it from their body language and tone of voice?

This is a great way to add interest to your story without any effort. Take our two aliens up there, which do you think would have the more interesting story to tell? The one who tells us his state of mind straight up or the one who is (badly) pretending that everything’s peachy?

Unless, of course,  the stating-the-obvious alien  is under some sort of stating-the-obvious magic and needs to find and defeat an evil witch before he alienates (ha!) all of his friends with brutal honesty, my guess is that you were thinking the guy who’s insisting that the world is sunshine and roses.

But why?

Is it because there’s a challenge there? Because there’s an opportunity for a friend to contradict them or to find out what’s really going on? Or is it because that’s what happens in real life all the time?

But how can you show this conflict? Unlike with my little aliens, writing is not a visual art. I can’t simply draw a sadface on someone and BAM insta-conflict.

Or, I could, but that would kind of defeat the purpose of the whole ‘creating interest through conflicting messages’ thing don’t you think? Compare:

Sam was upset, “Totally fine over here,” he insisted.


The corners of Sam’s mouth tightened, “Totally fine here,” he said after a small hesitation.

Which created the most interest? And Why?

The second one, yes? The one where instead of describing an emotional state (‘he was upset’) I described the signs of that emotion as you might see them on a real person. (As a side note, if you’re trying to work out the correct expression for a given emotion I’d suggest you don’t practice it on public transport. Weird looks may be given.)

So how else can we create this conflict? If you’re writing in first person, one of the major advantages of using that style is that you have access to your protagonist’s inner life. You have fulltime access to their thoughts about what they’re saying and who they’re saying it too and look into the differences between what they’re thinking and what the world at large hears. Hence we get moments like

I smiled, “Of Course I’ll help you”  Loserface.

Of course, if you describe every nuance of emotion rather than just stating it outright you run into the murky territory of Shiny Shiny Floors. Especially when there’s no need to hide your character’s emotional state. For example, if they’re about to start yelling it’s probably a good bet that they look angry.

Another place Captain Obvious likes to show up is in describing motivations and reasons for people’s actions. For example, you don’t really want a character to show up and say something like:

“Captain Snivelwurst, I am upset with you because you murdered my parents.”

Wouldn’t you agree that it would be much more effective simply to let them know their crime and tell them to prepare to die?

Similarly, if your reader has been following the story with any kind of concentration they should be able to pick up on things without captain obvious blaring it at them. Let’s say that your protagonist was abandoned as a child and you’ve already discussed what a big event that was and how damaging it was for them. And then somewhere along the line they come across someone who’s about to do the runner on their kid. When your character reacts to that new there doesn’t need to be an explainer there, helpfully reminding us that this mirrors what happened to them. We know that. Get on with the story.

Unfortunately, working out what is obvious is something that you, as the writer, are probably not equipped for. You know the inner workings of the characters and you know the boring and somewhat grisly inner workings of your story. This is where readers who aren’t afraid to be honest about when they find something confusing or when they feel like you’re beating them over the head come in handy.

Now before I round off this post, I should probably mention that I’m terrible at this. I have a bad habit of either chronically under explaining things, imagining that readers are privy to the inner workings of my mind and logical reasoning (a fate I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemies), or stating the same thing five different times just to make sure that everyone got the message.

Hey, no one’s perfect.

And before I forget, my friend Aniko Carmean has just published her first book, Stolen Climates. It’s a horror novel where Mother Nature herself is out for blood. You should check it out.

And I’ll also leave you with this which is everything I just talked about taken to a hilarious extreme.


About Meg Laverick

I can never be found without a cup of tea in my hand or a notebook in my bag. In between university and generally being awesome I read, write and nerd (that's a verb, right?). I also like analysing things that are probably best left alone.
This entry was posted in Writing and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Conversing with Captain Obvious

  1. Thanks for mentioning Stolen Climates! Even more so, thanks for a really slick demonstration of why it’s better to show instead of tell. We hear that old saw all the time, but you’ve done a really good job of well, showing us!

    For all of you who are selfish, single-commuters who sit in traffic quite often like I do, remember that people in other cars can see you, too. So that practicing facial expression? Not unnoticed by the poor guy in the sedan next to you!

    • Meg Laverick says:

      No problem, I started reading Stolen Climates yesterday. It may take me a while because it’s on my phone and the battery’s been… finnicky of late but I am getting there. I almost died when I saw my name in the acknowledgements section. Huge moment o’ pride there. But enough about me. Tell me – how does it feel now that you’re a published author?

      • Hi! Thanks for giving Stolen Climates a read! It means a lot to me – as did your help when I was struggling to come up with a descriptive blurb about it.

        It feels… odd! Exciting, too, but I’m still adjusting to the book belonging to the world instead of to me. It’s a strange thing to have people I know start talking about events from the book that were in my head exclusively for almost two years – like everyone around me has suddenly developed mind-reading abilities!

      • Sent you a PDF copy of Stolen Climates to the email you use when you comment on my blog so you don’t have to torment your phone battery. Can’t believe that didn’t occur to me to do yesterday.

  2. Ben says:

    I’m glad you picked my favorite Obvious Legolas moment. Every time I watched ROTK with friends, we would get all excited in the seconds leading up to that line.

    • Meg Laverick says:

      My favourite part of that clip is the expression on Legolas’s face. Like he’s just said something ground breaking and he’s really pleased with himself. Gets me every time.

      • Ben says:

        I also love that no one responds or gives any indication that he’s said anything, as if this is something that they’re all used to by now.

  3. phoenixandtiger says:

    Well, this certainly shows how to show and not tell. But I tend to think it’s a bit… well, easier telling about showing-and-telling instead of actually showing showing-and-telling. And that doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense.

    I don’t seem to be making a lot of sense nowadays. I think it’s because of exams and the end of the school year so close.

    Great post, and I’ll definitely be checking out that Stolen Climates book. Mother Nature going crazy on you? Heck yeah.

    • Meg Laverick says:

      My sympathies on exams etc. But on the bright side, imminent holidays?

      Do you mean that it’s easier to say that you should show not tell rather than actually doing it?

      • phoenixandtiger says:

        Yes – exactly. I mean, it’s like me. I can say I’m going to be awesome and write every single day for MilWordY (which is not happening…. at all) but in reality it’s harder to do.

        It’s like, once you get down to the logistics of it, there’s always that nagging voice in the back of your head saying ‘Oh that’s waaay too much talking, put some description in.’

  4. Bethany says:

    Meg! We officially need to be Facebook friends as of 2 months ago! Why? So that when I find out that the book ‘Legend’ by Marie Lu that I keep passing at work and thinking about reading is actually written by an artist on dA that I have followed for years but seeing as I haven’t been on dA in years I didn’t know this, that I can tell you!! (I realize that the past sentence sucks in construction but hopefully it makes it feel like I’m actually speaking words and stuff to your face rather than your blog :P)

    In fact I actually played around with one of the Flash games she made which sort of pre-date the whole idea of Legend, the “Airship Balloons” game. Mind=blown!

    I tried to Facebook stalk you but couldn’t find you. Apparently I suck at Facebook.

    Her dA account:

  5. Bethany says:

    So about .52 seconds after posting that comment I realized that your comments show your full name. What was that I was saying about sucking at Facebook, stalking and such?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s